in S’ólh Téméxw
“Reconciliation” is an aspirational concept expressing the hope that Xwélmexw (Indigenous people) and XwelÍtem (non-Indigenous settler Canadians) can find a way to live together in a good way;
to be of good mind.
Image of spindle whorl (hover over image)
The Halq'eméylem principles of Iets’e th’ále (one heart) and lets’e mó:t (one mind) speak to the importance of working collectively and of striving for unity.
We also like the metaphor of the financial balance sheet. If you over spend from your account (do something wrong) you cannot simply start fresh. First you have to make amends – put money back into your account so that the balance sheet will be reconciled.
But we recognize that “reconciliation” has become a compromised term for many Indigenous people in S’ólh Téméxw (the Stó:lō World). It has a hollow ring that people associate with empty and insincere government promises.
In Canada, the XwelÍtem society needs to make amends, correct the wrongs that have been done, so that the relationship with Indigenous people can be reconciled.
We have organized this information here so that we can provide it back to the people, educators, and leadership of the lower Fraser River Indigenous communities to help them better assess their ever changing relationship with XwelÍtem Canadian society. But there are lessons here for members of XwelÍtem society too.
The information presented here is meant to provide all people with insights and reflections to help them protect, defend, and enhance Indigenous rights and title.
At its most basic level reconciliation is about building genuine respect.
“I want you to be my friend, and I want to be your friend. And I want our grandchildren to be friends.”
But we all know that being friends can be complicated by our past experiences. The challenges of maintaining a friendship sometimes require some difficult emotional work on all sides, beyond just the sharing of truths. This was discussed by Lynne Davis, Chris Hiller, Cherylanne James, Kristen Lloyd, Tessa Nasca & Sara Taylor in their 2016 article “Complicated pathways: settler Canadians learning to re/frame themselves and their relationships with Indigenous peoples:”
“…providing education and information to settler Canadians is not sufficient to shift the relationship between Indigenous peoples and settler colonial society. Canadians have a deep emotional and cultural investment in the status quo and are the beneficiaries of past and present injustices, particularly with respect to the occupation of Indigenous lands which settlers consider to be their own.”
Mizanay Gheezhik, Canadian Senator Murray Sinclair, the former chair of the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission
We wanted people to be aspirational in the way they conceived of reconciliation.
What would that look like?
What challenges still face us before that can be achieved?
What opportunities exist to help us build, secure, and sustain reconciliation?
We asked participants to try and envision a future world where reconciliation has been achieved:
Project participants’ identified several opportunities and challenges. These can be seen as providing a rationale for future research required for laying the groundwork for building reconciliation in two main streams:
1) Research that facilitates the resurgence of Indigenous culture, governance, and economics.
2) Research that facilitates the decolonization of Canadian society by helping contemporary Canadians see the ways in which they have inherited certain privileges that their ancestors achieved by undermining Indigenous culture and alienating Indigenous people from their land and resources.
...and nine broad categories: